On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:28 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > I like the idea of showing things that need to be pushed upstream, but > there's a lot of overhead with mr status here, both in other output, and > in name. I'm afraid the two are confusingly similar.
The two are inherently overlapping. mr status is a subset of mr summary, since locally modified or uncommitted files are files that need to be committed (or put in .gitignore) and pushed to the remote(s). > It seems either mr status could be extended to include this info, or a > more focused command made with a more descriptive name, that shows > only things that need to be pushed. I would be in favour of extending mr status and maybe adding the more focused commands as well, maybe like this: mr uncommitted: lists uncommitted modifications only mr status: lists uncommitted modifications plus things that need pushing mr unpushed: lists only things that are committed locally but need pushing -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
