Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 21:49 -0500, Neal Murphy wrote: [...] > Regardless of what I do as a mortal user, I shoudn't get a black screen of > death.
Absolutely. > Attached is a jpg of the screen; I have the 15MP original if I removed too > much > detail. [...] This is a *great* picture, absolutely clear. So the code tells me that the processor was instructed to read from the address in RCX, and the dump shows me that the value is: RCX: f7ffc9000052c1d8 Current 64-bit x86 processors really only use 48-bit virtual addresses, which must begin with 0000 or ffff. So this address seems to have been corrupted: a single bit has changed. This could be caused by a software bug but it looks much more like a hardware fault. You may be able to confirm a RAM fault with memtest86+. Unfortunately it doesn't reliably find faults, and it doesn't particularly stress the CPU or other parts of the system that could also be at fault. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
