On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:08:14 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Adding a virtual package wasn't what I've meant:
Well, your original message included 'or provide some dummy-package (also e.g. "exiftool)' ... ah, "dummy package" was the keyword, not Provides, ok. Anyway: What I've done now confirms to our group policy ( http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/policy.html#package_naming_policy ) and common practice across other similar packages. > I rather meant a binary package exiftool, that contains the current > package's: > /usr/bin > /usr/bin/exiftool > /usr/share/man/man1 > /usr/share/man/man1/exiftool.1p.gz > > and depends on the perl package. Yup, that's the separate package option. I'm not in favour of this but if someone else from the pkg-perl team wants to go this way I won't stop them. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Joan Baez: The Night They Drove ol Dixie Down
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
