Hi, Philippe Le Brouster wrote (31 Oct 2012 10:06:04 GMT) : > Le lundi 29 octobre 2012 à 19:04 +0000, Adam D. Barratt a écrit: >> As you mentioned above, testing currently has 0.3.10. The relevant >> diff is thus 0.3.10 to 0.3.12, not from 0.3.11.
> Here are the information from 0.3.10 to 0.3.12 : I'm not in the mood to review the whole thing entirely again now, but FWIW I've upgraded to 0.3.11 as soon as it was out to fix #649179, and at this time I had reviewed the entire 0.3.10..0.3.11 code changes (I've been keeping an eye on this project for a while) and they looked good. So, in case it may be useful, here's my review for 0.3.11..0.3.12: basically, all right, modulo the newly introduced "it is preferable to set the variables RAMTMP, RAMLOCK from /etc/default/tmpfs" comment that seems a bit unclear to me: I think s/from/in/ would tell me more clearly what I should do. Probably not a blocker, though. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
