* Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org) [121024 03:57]: > On 24.10.2012 03:29, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Don, in your option 4B, I wonder if it would be a good idea to have the > > depend be something like g-n-m|wicd|no-network-manager > > The "gnome" meta-package certainly won't get an alternative dependency > on wicd. That would be completely stupid and miss the point of this > dependency. The GNOME desktop has zero integration with wicd, so this > alternative dependency is completely backwards.
You think it would be better to move it to recommends instead? > Why don't you force a dependency on ifupdown on us, or ifplugd or whatever. Do you think that would be better for our users? > This whole crusade by the ctte is so ridiculous, but unfortunately I > can't laugh about that anymore. Where is there a crusade? I don't see any. And btw, it doesn't help to replace reason by emotion. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
