reassign 595920 src:linux linux-2.6/2.6.32-21 found 595920 linux/3.0.0~rc1-1~experimental.1 quit
Grant McLean wrote[1]: > It looks like someone has got the kernel patches working with 3.2 (and > later in the thread, 3.3). > > http://www.mail-archive.com/lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03397.html Thanks! In that message, Xavi León wrote: | FYI, I attach the kernel patchset (based on the 3.0.0-lxc1 version on | the website) for the linux version 3.2.9. Mainly I removed the patches | already applied upstream and minor twicks to comply with some changes | on the kernel. I guess they may need still some work to make it The tarball contains six patches: 00001-add-SA_CLDREBOOT-flag.patch 00002-Notify-container-init-parent-a-reboot-occured.patch 00007-pidns-Don-t-allow-new-pids-after-the-namespace-is-d.patch 00008-pidns-Support-unsharing-the-pid-namespace.patch 00014-ns-proc-Add-support-for-the-mount-namespace.patch 00015-ns-proc-add-support-for-the-pid-namespace.patch They don't match the patches in the 3.0.0-lxc1 patchset I downloaded (tarball sha1sum: 62be7a82f83c1b2dd0f45e23d09d97d3b49d1e8b) too closely. Xavi, where do these patches come from? Can we have your sign-off on them? (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what this means.) > It really would be good to get lxc-attach working on a stock kernel. Thanks much for your work on this. Sincerely, Jonathan [1] http://bugs.debian.org/595920 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
