On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > 2012/9/3 Michael Vogt <m...@debian.org>: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:24:24PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> > ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: [..] > > I created a branch at > > http://anonscm.debian.org/bzr/bzr/apt/python-apt/debian-wheezy/ that > > is based on the debian-sid branch but disables auth.py. I am happy to > > upload this to wheezy if that approach is approved by the release > > team. > > Release Team: > > A separate branch was created for Wheezy and a debdiff submitted. Is > there anything else missing to move this issue forward and achieve a > concensus about what will be allowed into Testing?
It would be great to know the direction, I uploaded a version of python-apt 0.8.8 to sid in the meantime with some more fixes. I am happy to cherry pick the fixes to the wheezy branch - but of course I need to know if thats the way forward or if 0.8.8 (with the auth.py module) is allowed to get in. I'm happy either way. I would slightly prefer 0.8.8 as the auth.py module is IMO a good idea compared to having multiple apps duplicating this code in various places. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
