On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jonathan Rosser <jonathan.ros...@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote: > On 13/10/12 04:59, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> >> Oh I see what you did there. I don't think that's gonna work in >> debian. TBH, I think we should just install the 10 bit libx264.so >> binary into the regular libx264-NN package and document it properly >> in ./usr/share/doc/libx264-NN/README.Debian. >> >> On the second thought, we could even install some wrapper into >> /usr/bin that starts the passed on argument with proper >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH. >> >> In any case, I don't see the point in adding new source or binary >> packages. >> > > Trouble is, when you do a 10 bit build you end up with a library of the > same name and installing to the same location as the 8 bit one. > > I'm no expert on the debian packaging, but I could not see a way of > renaming the 10 bit .so (dh_install won't do it). There might well be a neat > way of achieving this. > > You have to re-run the configure script with different options to create > the 10 bit version, and that's well beyond what I know how to do in the > rules file.
Something like this commit should do the trick: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/x264.git;a=commitdiff;h=ceab497a30560db9db7bf6ded594400f76a2686a This is not finished, though. It still needs documentation in README.Debian. I'm also thinking about included a wrapper script that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH. And it is of course totally untested, so feedback more than welcome. -- regards, Reinhard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
