Package: xournal Version: 0.4.6~pre20110721-1+b1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? http://xournal.sourceforge.net reported the new version July 2012 * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action? * What outcome did you expect instead? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages xournal depends on: ii ghostscript-x 9.05~dfsg-6 ii libatk1.0-0 2.4.0-2 ii libc6 2.13-33 ii libcairo2 1.12.2-1 ii libfontconfig1 2.9.0-6 ii libfreetype6 2.4.9-1 ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.26.1-1 ii libglib2.0-0 2.32.3-1 ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.30.3-1 ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.10-1 ii libpango1.0-0 1.30.0-1 ii libpoppler-glib8 0.18.4-3 ii libx11-6 2:1.4.99.901-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13 xournal recommends no packages. xournal suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
