CSights wrote:
> I guess 1 "here" is the repository and 2 and 3 are devices? Is there some
> kind of master/slave relationship between 1 and {2,3}They're all peers. > My brain thinks of 1,2,3 as just being directories (on different computers) > while the set which is being synchronized is the repository. In other words > 1,2,3 are peers which all have the same data. It would be okay if that is > not > the way it will work, I'd just like to see the UI organized and language used > in such a way that makes this obvious. I've changed the wording to: git-annex is watching over your files in ~/lib/sound It will automatically notice changes, and keep files in sync with these repositories: And the "here" repository is not included in the list. I am, so far, stubbornly clinging to the "repository" term, in the git sense. While this is indeed a word that the user may not be familiar with, it has a specific meaning that "directory" or "folder" does not. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
