Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 07:40 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mi, 10 Okt 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: > > It's not clear to me why you're saying an epoch would be necessary. The > > fix you sent could be applied to the version in testing and uploaded > > there directly. If you could prepare that upload and send us a final > > debdiff that would be great. > > Ok, so *how* would I name the new version? ANd how do I upload > directly to testing? > > I have prepared a package with > maildir-utils (0.9.8.4-4) testing; urgency=low > so the release lies above the version in testing, but still below > the version in unstable.
The answer to your second question is in the changelog snippet you posted :-) - use "testing", "wheezy" or "testing-proposed-updates" as the distribution. In terms of versions the above would work, although "0.9.8.4-3+deb7u1" would more more conventional, to explicitly indicate that the upload was made out of series. The diff looks okay to me. Please feel free to go ahead with the upload; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
