On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dave Steele <dste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: ... >> Why not fix sensible-lomua.diff instead instead of adding a new patch which >> in fact >> removes sensible-lomua.diff? >... >> But I see the point of this patch.. >> >> But we probably should check for xdg-open, use it if there and if not, do >> what >> we have already? >> >
debdiff, and updated sensible-lomua.diff, attached.
sensible-lomua.debdiff
Description: Binary data
sensible-lomua.diff
Description: Binary data
