Hi, On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:52:32AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 12:34 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > severity 643921 important > > thanks > > How is a possible policy violation (and maybe copyright violation) not > serious?
As Jordan stated, the files under question are the product (redirected standard output) of non-free software, whose copyright statements are reprinted in their output as is generally customary. I do not see that this is a policy and/or copyright violation. Those files are shipped as examples and for validation. You could compare it with random (lawfully) Adobe produced PDFs shipped in a PDF parser library as testfiles to see that the parser is still intact. If ftp-masters or whoever think this is a huge problem, we can remove them. I already replaced the NWChem produced files with newly created ones using the (now open sourced) nwchem package in testing/unstable. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
