Hi, On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Francois Gouget <fgou...@free.fr> wrote: > Package: libxslt1-dev > Version: 1.1.26-13 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > The amd64 version conflicts with the i386 one which makes it impossible to > install both. As a result the /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libxslt.so symbolic > link is missing so that developping 32bit applications (e.g. Wine) using this > library is impossible on a 64bit system. >
Yes, I'm aware of that. The problem here is that I still haven't given it enough tries to make xslt-config identical across all architecture, help is welcomed. > Furthermore this development package does not seem to be multiarch aware as > there is no Multi-Arch field. > > My understanding is that as long as there are no architecture-dependent > headers there is no obstacle (i.e. no toolchain issue) to tagging the > development package as 'Multi-Arch: same'. The symbolic link (and any static > libraries) should be no issue as they are already in the > architecture-qualified folders. > > A good model for this appears to be the libx11-dev package. > Without making sure the package is co-installable, I'd rather go without M-A field. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
