* Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> [120927 09:50]:
> Am 26.09.2012 19:44, schrieb Etienne Millon:
> >Downgrading as there was no previous armel package built.
>
> But isn't armel a release arch for wheezy and thus FTBFS=RC?
I think it's not because :
- there was no previous binary package so it does not block eventual
migrations. eg, zsnes will be the same situation when it will
be "Arch: any-i386" : a FTBFS on hurd won't be a regression.
- glyr isn't part of wheezy, so even if it was RC it would be
acceptable (ie, not part of wheezy RC bugs)
Anyway, I'll prepare a package in a few days, in order to fix #688821
too.
--
Etienne Millon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
