Hello Martin,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Martin Pitt <mp...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Julian Taylor pointed out that this unexpectedly affected uwsgi, as
> that started to include "pg_config --cflags", and caused uwsgi to
> FTBFS:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687084
Yes, the uwsgi's build system used the output of "pg_config --cflags"
in building of the plugin named "probepg", which is a shared library.
There are no need for postgres' cflags, and I removed the inclusion
with this patch:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/uwsgi/1.2.3+dfsg-5/remove-pg_config_cflags-in-probepg.patch
>
> This has been fixed in 1.2.3+dfsg-5 now. So we need to coordinate the
> unblocking of PostgreSQL 9.1.5-2 with that uwsgi version. Janos, did
> you want to get -5 into testing, or should we put the pg_config fix
> into testing-proposed-updates?
This change, and some of the important upstream patches that I added
to the -5 release are not making problems with any package currently
in testing. There are no uwsgi 1.2.3+dfsg-5 build issues in testing
(at least for amd64). The patch that is fixing 687084 is backward
compatible with previous postgresql releases including the 9.1.5-1.
I would like to ask for unblock from release team for 1.2.3+dfsg-5, as
there are no need for testing-proposed-updates, if you agree?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
> --
> Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
> Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Thanks,
Janos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
