>>>>> Enrico Zini <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 11:42:40AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
[Dropping [email protected] from Cc: as
non-relevant.]
[…]
>> Surprisingly this shows more game then just games::rpg, shouldn't it
>> be the reverse way?
[…]
> In theory, I would expect the same as you; however that behaviour is
> not enforced, and game::rpg and game::rpg:rogue, as well as
> game::board, game::board:chess, game::sport, and game::sport:racing,
> are all considered completely different tags.
> I can see two ways of bringging the theory in line with practice:
> 1. adding a hint to the tagging interface to suggest people to add
> game::foo when the game::foo:bar tag is there;
> 2. renaming the data without a hierarchy (i.e. game::rogue,
> game::chess, game::racing)
But why exactly is inferring foo::bar from foo::bar:baz not an
option? Personally, I'd expect the tags database to have the
most specific tag (or tags), with debtags(1) performing such an
inference by itself.
[…]
--
FSF associate member #7257 http://sfd.am-1.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
