Le Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:17:17AM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > * Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org>, 2012-09-10, 17:39: > >How about either downgrading the importance, severity or certainty > >of that tag, or change the check so that it also tolerates > >recommends or suggests on python ? > > AFAICT lintian _does_ tolerate Recommends/Suggests. If it does not, > please show us a concrete test case.
Thanks for the clarification ! In that case, the description needs a rewording, because for velvet 1.2.03~nozlibcopy-1 we were arguing whether it should depend on or recommend Python because of the python-script-but-no-python-dep tag, while as I understand now the problem is that the relationship was unversionned ? (The problematic scripts have call /usr/bin/env python2.5). (I also have been confused by the source code which uses $depends in a way that made me think that it were not checking for recommends). How about the following ? "This package either misses to depend on, recommend or suggest the package python, or does not specify a correct version." Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
