On Thu, Sep 06 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Reading the patch, I'm assuming that this means that every user > upgrading the package will have their cache immediately invalidated, as > there's no way they can know the above information before the upgrade > has been completed.
You are right. > Not being that familiar with the package, I'm not sure whether this is a > practical issue in this case... It's not an issue in term of proper functioning, only in term of performance after restart since this will be a cold start. But that's the price to pay for security, so I think it's worth it. -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker & freelance http://julien.danjou.info */
pgp6ig2tMNmWT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
