On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:33:58 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf <r...@researchut.com> wrote:
> The patch looks okay to me. But I am not sure which way we want to go. A > better approach could be to use a udev rule. Also someone needs to test > this scenario with the newer event based init daemons. Mine was a quick and dirty hack but out of necessity: without it the startup fails, and it's been failing in the last year or so. Yesterday was the day I was able to spend a few hours on testing and finalising. I'm not against udev rules but I didn't master 'em so I don't want to mess around it. Which init do you particularly have in mind? I can install anything on my test VMs until I send them to oblivion. :-) [I'll check them though.] peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
