On 08/31/2012 09:29 PM, Andre Tomt wrote: > On 31. aug. 2012 05:12, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> Could you explain a bit more what needs to be done in the ip6tables, in >> the init script? Should I just create a MiniUPnP chain in the forward >> table as well? >> >> I'm ok to write that part, though I need directions. > > Only rule that is needed it the one in FORWARD
Ok. > and just use ip6tables > instead of iptables. Keep in mind the ip6tables ruleset is separate from > the iptables ones though, so it needs to have its own dupe/dirty checks > (same parameters as with iptables). Of course I know how ip6tables work! :) I came with the following patch: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/zigo/miniupnpd.git;a=commitdiff;h=544849ed4bbca0305b4144dfd2125abde913ae21 Can you tell if this is what needed to be done? Is there some new parameters that needs to be given to the daemon? I guess I should also make these ip6tables stuff optional, but I don't see how it can hurt anything, even if ip6 isn't available where the daemon is running, so I wonder if I should just leave it, always... Let me know your thoughts, Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
