On 31. aug. 2012 04:32, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 08/31/2012 05:14 AM, Andre Tomt wrote:
Package: miniupnpd
Version: 1.7-4
Not sure what to make of severity. Its pretty much a requirement for IPv6.
As for most of your bug submission, these are request for new features,
so this falls under the "wishlist". Just have a look to what reportbug
explains for the bug definitions:
6 normal: a bug that does not undermine the usability of the whole
package; for example, a problem with a particular option or menu item.
vs
8 wishlist: suggestions and requests for new features.
Your request clearly falls into the "wishlist" category.
Debateable ;) According to the upstream "documentation" this is a
requirement for IPv6 and I'm pretty sure working IPv6 support is a
release goal (though we are too late for wheezy anyway I guess).
Yup - http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/FullIPv6Support
But I admit, for some of my submissions I've just been to lazy to do any
thinking about the severity. I'll try harder, hehe
Also, my time working on this package is limited. So if you wish to have
such new features added in Debian (which would really be great), I would
strongly suggest that you also start working on the problems and provide
patches, not just comments in the BTS. Otherwise I will have to close
the bugs after 6 months of inactivity (that's just basic bug triaging,
the issue stays in the BTS archive).
OK. I'm fine with providing patches, and will attempt to do so for my
remaining issues.
Is there repository somewhere that has the latest changes not yet
uploaded to the archive? I'd prefer working against something that is
more closely tracking actual development if possible. Not a requirement
but if its already available publicly somewhere that would be super nice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
