Under #652011, presumably with reference to my proposed addition to policy here, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > Policy already says what you want it to say currently, Where? If policy is already clear on this, then this bug should be closed rather than wishlisted. On the other hand, if policy is not clear on this, then it should be made clear, and this present bug is more than wishlist until that is done. I don't think this proposal has to be a highly debated controversy. I'm just proposing to document the status quo. The question of whether or not there will be motivation to change the status quo in the future can be left entirely open, but in the mean time it should be universally agreeable to have the status quo clearly documented. And it only requires a couple sentences in the right place in policy for that to be accomplished.
-Zach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
