On 27.08.2012 08:34, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 18:39:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:00 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 10:19:45 schrieben Sie:
> > +- static std::auto_ptr<SaslAuthenticator>
> > createAuthenticator(Connection& connection, bool isShadow); ++
> > static std::auto_ptr<SaslAuthenticator>
> > createAuthenticator(Connection& connection);
> >
> > createAuthenticator() is a public symbol of libqpidbroker, which
is
> > shipped as a public library in /usr/lib. That means the library
has
> > changed ABI without changing SONAME afaics.
>
> libqpidbroker is only used by the qpid broker itself. There's
nothing in
> testing that uses the broker library - besides the broker itself.
> Unstable has the qpidd-msgstore module that makes use of that
library.
qpidd-msgstore is also in testing. Does the earlier version not use
the
broker library?
Hmm. Is it possible to remove it from testing? The version that
matches the
current 0.16 release of qpidd got stuck because it didn't compile on
all
architectures. 0.14 qpidd-msgstore will not work with 0.16 of qpidd.
Okay; removal hint added.
> I'm not sure if and how I can simply change the SONAME for the
broker.
> And if there's a need for that in this case. Any hints?
It's shipped in a public library directory and versioned so yes it
should be updated (even without the existence of a reverse
dependency).
Assuming the SONAMEs come from upstream, it'd be worth discussing
the
issue with them so we don't end up carrying a Debian-specific change
for
it.
Just sent a message to upstream. Lets see.
Thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
