-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Package: sslh
Version: 1.13b-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Justification: FTBFS on mips buildd

Le 26/08/2012 06:27, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> David Prévot <taf...@debian.org> (25/08/2012):
>> sslh failed to build on corelli (again), while it manage to build on
>> lucatelli last month. I just added a missing build-dependency (fixing
>> an FTBFS), but the test suite failed on corelli:
>>
>>> ./sslh-select -v -f -u buildd --listen localhost:9002 --ssh 
>>> ip6-localhost:9000 --ssl ip6-localhost:9001 -P /tmp/sslh_test.pid
>>> Name or service not known `ip6-localhost:9000'
>>> Name or service not known `ip6-localhost'
>>> Name or service not known `ip6-localhost'
>>> Name or service not known `ip6-localhost'
>> […]
> 
> we discussed that earlier with the maintainer. The idea was that this
> package shouldn't rely on the buildd's having an ip6-localhost line in
> /etc/hosts. It should have been fixed in a later upload, but apparently
> that didn't happen yet. (ISTR Aurélien said he would file an RC bug if
> it didn't see an upload a few days after that, but he might have been
> busy on other things.)
> 
>> gabrielli seems down (and the only DD-available mips machine), so I
>> barely can investigate the issue, sorry about that. Would it be
>> possible to build it again on lucatelli? Thanks in advance for
>> considering.
>>
>> gb sslh_1.13b-3.1 . mips
> 
> Nah, I'd prefer if you could file an RC bug about that, and fix it. ;)

Here is the first step, thanks for the detailed explanation.

> Removing the ip6-localhost line from your /etc/hosts should be all you
> need to reproduce it.
> 
> Thanks already.
> 
> Mraw,
> KiBi.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=THxh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to