On Sat 2012-08-25 (16:34), Philipp Kern wrote: > Upstream could be petitioned to remove that clause... (I sort of understand > it, > too, but it's clearly against Debian's standards.)
"Upstream" is me, the original author of F*EX. No, I will not remove the anti-military clause in the license. > Well, it could still be moved to non-free. Sounds as a good compromise solution for me. > I wonder how it passed NEW in the beginning, though. It was always that way, > you say? Yes, the anti-military clause was there since the beginning of the project. What I have changed lately was the basis license from GPL to AGPL. -- Ullrich Horlacher Informationssysteme und Serverbetrieb Rechenzentrum IZUS/TIK E-Mail: horlac...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de Universitaet Stuttgart Tel: ++49-711-68565868 Allmandring 30a Fax: ++49-711-682357 70550 Stuttgart (Germany) WWW: http://www.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/ REF: <20120825143456.ga20...@spike.0x539.de> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
