On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 22:08:21 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Would an updated package, with changes over 1:1.18.1-1 as shown in the > attached patch, be acceptable for wheezy? > [...]
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index bfdf63e..e4c5c0a 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ > +libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1wheezy1) testing; urgency=low > + > + * [40d6de2] Remove useless dh_python* overrides (Closes: #681587) > + > + -- Hilko Bengen <ben...@debian.org> Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:36:10 +0200 > + > libguestfs (1:1.18.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream version > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules > index 6386c1d..f496a8e 100755 > --- a/debian/rules > +++ b/debian/rules > @@ -126,13 +126,6 @@ override_dh_install: > erlang-depends -perlang-guestfs > dh_install > > -# Workaround for python3-defaults < 3.2~b2-1 > -# ("do not rename .so files outside dist-packages directory") > -override_dh_python3: > - dh_python3 -p python-libguestfs > -override_dh_python2: > - dh_python2 -p python-libguestfs -V 2.6- > - > # Workaround for Lintian warning > # "{pre,post}inst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig" > override_dh_makeshlibs: > git finished. If that results in correct dependencies then yes, it seems acceptable. Thanks, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature