On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:53:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:37:52PM +1000, James Tocknell wrote: > > > I've patched startpar to special-case lightdm as for gdm/kdm, but this > > doesn't appear to have any effect here (but is probably generally a good > > thing to have). > > The change that was committed has nothing at all to do with this bug, and to > me it looks like an unnecessary divergence from startpar upstream; so I've > reverted those changes from the git repo. IMHO it's not something that's > worth carrying a delta from upstream over. But feel free to reinstate if > you disagree.
My thinking here was that if startpar is special casing the priorities of display managers, shouldn't it be behaving the same for all the common ones? That said, I am not certain /why/ it's special casing them in the first place; certainly lightdm appears to function perfectly well without the patch. I don't have strong feelings either way here--personally I'd prefer them all removed if this is solely to hack in something better expressed through dependencies. > BTW, Roger, could you please run 'echo DEBCHANGE_RELEASE_HEURISTIC=changelog > >> ~/.devscripts' on your development machine? This is the only sensible > behavior to use with dch in a shared VCS; it's very frustrating to have to > check the archive or look at git tags each time to figure out whether the > changes I'm looking at on trunk are uploaded or not... I've done this, but isn't it the documented default behaviour? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
