On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 03:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> (13/07/2012): > > Please unblock gunicorn/0.14.5. It fixes a grave security bug (#681471) > > as well as a number of smaller issues. > > > > It's been in unstable for 10 or 11 days now and I've been using it > > production for that time without issue. > > given the diff against testing (45 files changed, 567 insertions(+), 289 > deletions(-)) and the amount of doc & tests updates, it would have been > helpful if you had extracted the actual code changes and attached that > to your report.
I've now been through the diff, but further explanation would indeed have been helpful. +<p>Timeout for graceful workers restart.</p> +<p>Generally set to thirty seconds. How max time worker can handle +request after got restart signal. If the time is up worker will +be force killed.</p> I assume this is an upstream change, but I had to read that middle sentence through a couple of times. +<li><strong>breaking change</strong>: take the control on graceful reload back. +graceful can't be overrided anymore using the on_reload function.</li> Does this have the potential to break current installations? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
