Hi, > There was a config file /etc/default/alsa for months. But after > upgrading alsa-base from 1.0.23+dfsg-4 to 1.0.25+2+nmu1, a new > config file /etc/default/alsa-base has been installed, keeping > /etc/default/alsa with the same contents (up to a blank line). To make things worse, the script /usr/sbin/alsa (which, btw, lacks a manpage) uses /etc/default/alsa. However, if I install just the unstable (1.0.25+2+nmu1) alsa-base package, only /etc/default/alsa-base gets created, so the script is non-functional. I assume that the goal was to actually rename the file in /etc/default to match the package name, but then of course its users must be changed, too.
Kind regards, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
