On 11 August 2012 15:57, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> controversially I've added x86 and x64 entries in cputable. > > I think that's a no-go, sorry. The problem is that after that change > there is no longer one unambiguous Debian arch for each GNU triplet, > which breaks
ditto. this is a no-go. The arches should use normal debian cputable, e.g. amd64/i386. What compilers we are going to provide and what optimisation levels chosen is a different matter. I am inclined to say that actually only i686 compiler & binaries will be provided, regardless of how the arch is named. Simply becuase: (a) we don't know what baseline xp/vista/7/8 actually are (b) we do know that at i686 mingw-w64 specific features are enabled (c) we do know that fedora and opensuse are cross-compiling up to i686, and for the sake of compatibility it would be nice to match. Apart from that, we are fine. I'd be happy if the patch would be applied, sans the cputable hunk. We can debate the complier/cpu level later ;-) Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
