On 12-08-09 at 11:47pm, Aron Xu wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Long description mentions that iptraf-ng is a fork of iptraf, but > > such historical info is less useful for people looking at packages > > to install. Much better would be describing *how* iptraf-ng > > compares to iptraf. > > > > Here is a quick review from archlinux: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22143 > > I'll try to reword the description to make it more clear.
Hmm - that does not look like a fork, but rather a revival. Did you discuss with the package maintainer of iptraf to _replace_ that instead of having both in Debian? Or why don't you find that sensible? Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
