On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:00:19PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > mån 2012-07-30 klockan 20:32 +0200 skrev Aurelien Jarno: > > retitle 670316 shishi: FTBFS on 64-bit big endian architecture: testsuite > > failure > > tag 670316 + patch > > thanks > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:55:53PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > thanks for the followup. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 02:54:15PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > > Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> writes: > > > > > your package FTBFSes on s390x because of a crash / failures in the > > > > > testsuite: > > > > > > > > > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > > > > /build/buildd-shishi_1.0.1-1-s390x-luumdM/shishi-1.0.1/tests' > > > > > /usr/bin/make check-TESTS > > > > > make[3]: Entering directory > > > > > /build/buildd-shishi_1.0.1-1-s390x-luumdM/shishi-1.0.1/tests' > > > > > shishi_authenticator_seqnumber_get() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_seqnumber_get() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_client() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_client() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_clientrealm() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_authorizationdata() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_cusec_get() failed > > > > > shishi_authenticator_ctime() failed > > > > > FAIL: authenticator > > > > > > > > Hi. Thanks for the report. I would either need a shell account on this > > > > architecture, or your help in tracking this down. Could you get a gdb > > > > backtrace of the self-test that crashes? Do you have any ideas on what > > > > makes this architecture different from all the others, where it builds > > > > and passes self-tests fine? Does it use the same gcc/glibc/linux > > > > versions as other build hosts? > > > > > > It's 64bit big endian, which isn't the case for all other Debian > > > architectures > > > (except debian-ports ppc64 and sparc64). As a DM you can request guest > > > access > > > yourself by following [1], you don't need anybody to vouch for you or > > > something. If you don't want to do that I can go and collect a > > > backtrace, but > > > it might take a few days, too. > > > > > > > The problem is indeed related to 64-bit big endian machines, it also > > fails to build on ppc64 ans sparc64. This is due to casting size_t > > pointers (len type in shishi) into int pointers (len type in libtasn1). > > The patch below fixes the problem. (Note that there are also plenty of > > format warning about size_t values being printed with %u, though they > > seem to be harmless). > > Thanks for debugging this. > > > > > Given we are in freeze period, would it be possible to upload a new > > revision of shishi with only these changes? I believe the release team > > would accept such a change and let the package migrate to testing. > > shishi is important on s390x in order to get inetutils built. > > Sure -- should I just upload to unstable? If you could ask the release > team that would be great. >
Yes, it's just about uploading that to unstable. Then i'll take care of asking the release team to let it migrate it to wheezy. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
