On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:43:43PM +0800, Frank Chung wrote: > I must confess that I'm not a regular Debian contributor, just a grateful > user of libpam-winbind who would like to help out (thanks maintainers!). > There may be perfectly good reasons why libpam-winbind (and libpam-smbpass) > is currently one package that I'm ignorant of.
Because splitting packages into tiny packages carries a cost in terms of Packages downloads, maintenance, and system understandability. This is a general problem of multiarch: same packages with maintainer scripts; I'd like for us to find a better solution than further splitting of packages. But if all else fails, yes, we can split them for wheezy. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature