On 23/07/12 09:37, Christian Engwer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:16:39PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> It was clearly a typo to *you*, in your context with the bug being present. 
>> In
>> my context, where everything is fine, *I* have no idea what "keyword" means.
>>
>> I am running gnome-keyring 3.4 and it works OK for me.
>>
>> Note that if your keyring is unlocked, gnome-keyring will prompt you to 
>> unlock
>> your keyring. While this dialog box is open, firefox will indeed not respond 
>> to
>> user input. If you think this is a bug, file it to the gnome-keyring
>> developers, but I guess they would call it a "security feature".
> 
> there is no reason treating users like idiots. If you would have read
> my last mail properly you'd have seen that I corrected my typo and
> explained that it is about storing the password. The keyring is
> unlocked and works for all other applications. But never mind, I don't
> care using this package anymore. And with this tone of correspondence
> I also don't care about helping any further.
> 

Don't be arrogant. You were the one that initially implied I was stupid for not
understanding your report. I explained to you why this is not a correct
assumption to make. If you would have read my last mail correctly, you would
have seen that I *did* read your last mail correctly.

As it is, you still have not provided enough useful information to constitute a
proper bug report. I repeat what I said in my very first email - I can't
understand you at all.

> I close the bug so that it doesn't distract you in your mailbox anymore.
> 
> Christian
> 
>> On 22/07/12 21:21, Christian Engwer wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:37:20PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
>>>> ping?
>>>
>>> pong!
>>>
>>>>>> adding an iceweasel keyword to the gnome-keyring will freeze
>>>
>>> This was clearly a typo... I wanted to say that adding a password in
>>> iceweasel (current from testing) results in a frozen iceweasel. I'd
>>> don't know what the exact reason is. Storing passwords in the
>>> traditional iceweasel vault works, just es the plugin did work some
>>> time ago. I suspect that the problem origins from the
>>> gnome-keyring. I used to have the 3.2 keyring and recently 3.4 entered
>>> from unstable.
>>>
>>> If you have a particular question I can try to give more details.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>>> Please elaborate - I don't understand this at all.
>>>>>
>>>>>> iceweasel. This extension used to work, but in newser versions it
>>>>>> doesn't anymore. I assume it is an incompatiblity with the gnome 3.4
>>>>>> keyring.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- System Information:
>>>>>> Debian Release: wheezy/sid
>>>>>>   APT prefers proposed-updates
>>>>>>   APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (400, 
>>>>>> 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
>>>>>> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kernel: Linux 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
>>>>>> Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
>>>>>> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Versions of packages xul-ext-gnome-keyring depends on:
>>>>>> ii  iceweasel          10.0.5esr-2
>>>>>> ii  libc6              2.13-33
>>>>>> ii  libgcc1            1:4.7.1-2
>>>>>> ii  libglib2.0-0       2.32.3-1
>>>>>> ii  libgnome-keyring0  3.4.1-1
>>>>>> ii  libnspr4           2:4.9.1-1
>>>>>> ii  libnspr4-0d        2:4.9.1-1
>>>>>> ii  libstdc++6         4.7.1-2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xul-ext-gnome-keyring recommends no packages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xul-ext-gnome-keyring suggests no packages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- no debconf information
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
>>>> https://github.com/infinity0
>>>> https://bitbucket.org/infinity0
>>>> https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
>>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
>> https://github.com/infinity0
>> https://bitbucket.org/infinity0
>> https://launchpad.net/~infinity0
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE
https://github.com/infinity0
https://bitbucket.org/infinity0
https://launchpad.net/~infinity0

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to