Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > I feel a bit ashamed that I did not realise.
No problem; thanks for looking into it now. I'm glad to see that the upstream developers understand my concern as well, and am fine with leaving EDAM in the main emboss-data package if it's indeed essential; at slightly under 1 megabyte, it falls (just) below the cutoff I suggested. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
