On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:43:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 332933 + wontfix > thanks > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 05:19:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Package: bash > > > > Version: 3.0-16 > > > > > > > > I just saw a lot big chunk of code in /etc/bash_completion > > > > Could you move that file to /usr/share/bash/ (or where it should be)? > > > > (/etc should be strictly used for configuration files not for code) > > > /etc/bash_completion is marked a conffile; I suppose its arguably not > > > .. but I suspect that it is intentionally stored in /etc/ to allow for > > > local changes. > > > > If there's a bug or an enhancement the user should send a patch and not > > keep the > > modification locally. > > > > If the user needs completion for a local private command then just load > > the configuration in the user created /etc file, but keep the original in > > usr to ease upgrades. > > you have the file as .dpkg-new > > > This way the system should load completion from /usr then local > > enhancements from /etc and lastly user completion (possibly loaded > > using .bash* files) > > > > (I also think Debian conffiles idea sucks but let's not get into that > > now. I'm leaving that for later) > > maybe, but I'll keep all scripts, which are sourced on system startup > in /etc. Completion is not sourced on startup. right?
-- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
