On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> (08/07/2012): >> Say what? This bumps SONAME compared to the version in wheezy and >> changes -dev package names, breaking all of the reverse deps in the >> process. How can that look remotely "good" for an unblock? > > Argh, failed to 'd' it after having started by reading the debdiff on > this bug report. Sorry about that, unblock cancelled.
I did not notice that the previous version 1.0.1-1 accepted at 2012-04-28 does not promote to 'testing'. I thought that the new version 1.0.1-2 of this mail fixes bugs of 1.0.1-1 in testing. Yes, 1.0.1.-1 had significant changes. However, it should have been in 'testing' before the freeze. In such a situation, can't I request an unblock? Regards, Daigo -- Daigo Moriwaki <daigo at debian dot org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
