Thanks for the reviewing. Please note that due to changes in sysvinit, I
can't use the following templates as I expected:
fs2ram/rcs_enforce_ramtmp_configuration
fs2ram/rcs_enforce_ramlock_configuration
(See #679715, the variables RAMTMP and RAMLOCK can't be modified
automatically by fs2ram).
So these two templates will be removed in the next version. No need to
spend time on it.
Justin B Rye a écrit:
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > I also wonder whether there should be more explanations about the
> > benefit one can get from such switch.
>
> I also wonder whether the defaults might flip-flop; maybe it would be
> safer to point at something like http://wiki.debian.org/RAMTMP... if
> any such page existed.
The default value of RAMTMP is probably not the one expected by an user
of fs2ram (in most use cases, /tmp need to be mounted in ram). Since the
modification of RAMTMP can't be done automatically, does this justify to
add a 'note' template in fs2ram ?
Cheers,
--
Philippe Le Brouster
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
