On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 02.07.2012 07:22, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: >>> > Please unblock package spandsp > [...] >>> On that basis, the changes from both -1 and -2 are relevant to the >>> unblock. While the changes between the current testing package and >>> -1 >>> aren't huge, the changelog isn't really very helpful in terms of >>> helping >>> me decide whether they're appropriate for an unblock as it just says >>> "new upstream version". >>> >>> Would it be possible to expand (briefly should be fine) on what the >>> changes in the new upstream version are? >> >> As of now there are two separate issues: > > Apologies if my question wasn't clear. I was asking for more detail on > why 0.0.6~pre20 is a better candidate for release than the version > that's currently in wheezy, other than by sheer virtue of being "newer".
There's no real changelog. However the difference between pre18 and pre20 is not big. pre19: https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/926c6eec0a2955dffccea3992232d0a064f4a5f6 A bugfix commit. IIRC the fix in t4_rx.c was discovered by faxes that managed to crash Asterisk. pre20: https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/83f249c1a0172d3246a2ffb69fb534f725bdbca3 Again: bugfixes. Sadly I'm not sure what for, exactly (that git tree is something I produce from tarballs and I have no better changelos, sadly). -- Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's tzaf...@cohens.org.il | | best tzaf...@debian.org | | friend -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
