>> Can I have a little context here? Why is it important enough to have >> multi-arch openjpeg to do an NMU just before the freeze? > > Hi Michael; > > It seems we need more time to discuss this, so I cancelled the upload > for now. > > Personally I think it would be better to wait until after the openjpeg5 > transition and then work on multiarchifying the latest version of the > library, presumably after the freeze. If there is some urgent reason to > push through multiarch at this time, I leave you and Mathieu (who is > an upstream maintainer and the main person interested on the debian > side) to sort that out.
The goal was to get multiarch enabled in all of wine's dependencies. openjpeg 1.5 is already multiarched, but that has yet to hit unstable. There is a lot of apparent brokenness in that transition, so 1.3 may be with us for a while: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/openjpeg.html The libopenjpeg2 dependency addition is a mistake, and I'll remove that. So, I would like to go ahead with the nmu again (with the above fixed). Would that be ok from your perspective? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
