On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:28AM -0300, Carlos Jordão wrote: > 2012/6/24 Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> > > > Hi Carlos, > > > > This RFS is marked [ITP], but is there an ITP bug ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Bart Martens > > > Hi Bart, > > I'm sorry, I didn´t understand your question.
No problem. > > I developed it, we (me and some colleagues) use it on a few projects, but > it can benefit everyone who needs a stronger string comparison than usual > means, for the portuguese language. > > This package doesn´t exist in debian distribution, so a I followed the > instructions to Request for package, There is a difference between these : - "request for package" = RFP - "intent to package" = ITP - "request for sponsorship" = RFS RFP is for requesting some software to be packaged in Debian, but invite other people to do the work. ITP is for expressing that you intend to do that work. RFS is for requesting a prepared package to be reviewed and accepted into Debian. You seem to have followed the instructions for RFS, and that is OK. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677564 > to include it into debian. I > understand this software is valuable, has reached some mature as program > and there is a paper about it. > > If I misunderstood the steps to ask for inclusion into debian, I´m sorry, No problem. > and I would like some advice how to propose it. Information on RFP and ITP can be found here: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ What you want to do now, is register an ITP and to set yourself as the owner of that ITP. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
