I have tested with gcc-4.4 and it seems to work okay. So that is an option.
On 19/06/12 11:58, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > On 19/06/12 11:45, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> On 19/06/12 09:10, Nicholas Bamber wrote: >>> 1.) compile against gcc-4.5 and g++-4.5 >>> 2.) set the magic TAOCRYPT_DISABLE_X86ASM thingy causing SSL connections >>> on those platforms to be slower. >> >> Hi, >> >> Did you try yet with gcc-4.4? > > Just trying that. > >> >> And have you checked with a newer gcc-4.7 package, just in case one of >> the (quite important) bug fixes in past weeks have made any difference? > > Yes we have used the most recent 4.7. > >> >> Otherwise, if TAOCRYPT_DISABLE_X86ASM would disable the "highliy >> optimized code", and if upstream have been reluctant to deal with that, >> I personally would accept any amount of performance loss by falling back >> to other code if it works and seems more maintainable. >> >> Regards, > > It's not really reluctance I think. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
