On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:17:55PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2012 02:12 AM, Guido Günther wrote: > >> Okay!! I'll see if I can come up with a patch in time. > > Great. The hard part is that we don't want to break the test suite and > > don't want to patch all the testcases either. I wonder if we should > > simply ship the symlnk proposed in the above report. Everything else > > isn't worth the effort. > > My fix was going to be about patching the testcases and the broken path. > But thanks for pointing it now, I don't have to spend that time. :-) > > I agree. Providing the symlink, or perhaps just documenting it, should > be good enough.
Patching the testcases is an uphill battle. They change quiet frequently so I think the symlink is simpler. We'll very likely split the package into libvirtd-xen, libvirt-kvm, libvirtd-... for 0.9.13 so we can add the symlink to libvirtd-xen only. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
