On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 14:11:34 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Am 16.06.2012 13:49, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:28:25 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > > > >> allegro4.4 is now a migration candidate and I didn't get access > >> to a porterbox yet. Can we continue the transition? > >> > > I don't think so. Either that FTBFS gets fixed, or the transition > > gets reverted, AFAICT. > > > > Cheers, Julien > > Even if allegro4.2 has the same bug? The last time it was built on > ia64 was a year ago with gcc 4.4.5 and since the changes between > allegro4.2 and allegro4.4 are not that big, chances are that > allegro4.2 doesn't built there anymore either. > hmm, no, in that case if the bug can't get fixed we'd have to remove all allegro reverse dependencies on ia64.
> Anyway, I poked DSA and da-manager, maybe that helps on the porterbox > front. > Thanks, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
