tags 676329 + squeeze pending thanks On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 08:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Yep, +squeeze1 is generally preferable as it makes it more obvious that > > the package is a post release update and ensures that the version is > > higher than any possible pre-existing binNMUs (obviously not an issue > > for an arch:all only package). It's not a blocker though. > > > > > > + * Add the missing dependency on libio-string-perl. Closes: #607272 > > > > > > That could mention the build-dependency side too? > > > > > > Otherwise looks good to me. > > > > Ditto; thanks for working on fixing this in stable. > > I changed the version, fixed the changelog and uploaded.
I've flagged the package for acceptance in to p-u; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
