Sorry for disturbance again. During this is a cloned bug I was taking the wrong bugnumber while adressing to the BTS. So this mail again with correct address for the bugtracker. ;)
Am 05.06.2012 07:52, schrieb Carsten Schoenert: > Hello Olleg! > > I know it is a long time that this bug was present, but is is still in > the buglist. The status of the opend bug on mozilla has not been > changend since your last entry there. > Because the bug is really old and hopfuly no longer exist i would like > to close them. > > But I want to aks you if there are still the problems around? > If not we can close this bug. > > Thanks in advice. > > Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail: >> tags 306522 + confirmed >> thanks >> >> In addition, confirming this bug. >> >> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:16:34AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: >>> severity 306522 important >>> thanks >>> >>> I consider extension compatibilty regressions compared with upstream >>> important. >>> >> >> - Alexander >> >> p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when >> replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/). > -- Regards Carsten Schoenert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
