Hi Axel, thank you very much for your comments.
> a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have overseen > some reasoning): > > notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and > notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz from SF seem to differ: > > 0ffd57a75f2c1a75ce551b3baef1fee0 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz > 96d004374e92e3188608a39afea2d75f notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 abe tar 754121 May 16 15:29 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 abe tar 762655 Apr 23 18:42 notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz > > Is this on purpose? The files in the two archives are the same according to a recursive md5sum, only the parent directories are called differently (we use 3-... as an upstream version, which we change to 3+... when importing into the Debian git repository to comply with [1]) and some file status information differs (maybe/probably for the same reason). > The upstream ChangeLog says "(The ChangeLog will be generated by > release scripts from svn logs)" -- looks like packaging a VCS > snapshot. But the version suggests that an official upstream release > and not a snapshot is packaged. Also such a ChangeLog stub should IMHO > not show up in the Debian package as it's useless. Arnout has dropped the changelog, thanks. > Even if mentors.d.n hasn't found relevant lintian warnings, the new > lintian does. :-) > > [hardening flags] We have enabled hardening flags through a Debian patch to the build system. A few Lintian warnings remain, but according to a discussion in #debian-mentors, these are false positives. Regards, Philipp [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#namever -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
