Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition
Please pardon me for apparently missing an important advisory for not using experimental first... Transition is tiny -- just 2 dependent packages on libbiosig-dev packages (below). "Transition bug" against biosig4c++ source is #675967. Outstanding FTBFS on ia64 was fixed (closed now) and I expect it to build fine on sparc (which would resolve #633346) The following source packages need to be rebuilt: sigviewer # this one might need a compatibility patch -- although seems to build nicely without openwalnut In terms of 'ben' lingo, my non-experienced guestimate that the transition should have the following parameters: Affected: .build-depends ~ /libbiosig-dev/ Good: .depends ~ /lbbiosig1/ Bad: .depends ~ /lbbiosig0/ What should be my course of action -- should I just close a transition bug (#675967) whenever transition slot is allocated? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
