On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 09:02:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev > m-a: same. You should also check for files in these packages.
Oh, I didn't know about that. libc0.1-dev is ok. libc0.3-dev is ok since it's only available for one architecture. libc6.1-dev is ok too. > -- > Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 > aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
